Our notes on the economy
As we wrote last month, we were having a hard time seeing the Federal Reserve Board
cutting rates in June. Now that seems like an impossibility. Inflation and the economy
appear to be cooling, however, not enough for the Fed to start cutting rates just yet. The job
market is still extremely robust with the unemployment rate staying below 4% for the last
27 months. The last time we saw this kind of streak was 1967-1970. We currently sit at
3.9% off the 3.4% we saw last month. Might we send the end of this streak? We don’t know.
Our discussion on the bond markets
We think that it is more important to be correct on the overall direction of any move than it
is to be correct on exactly when a particular move begins. Where there is almost 100%
agreement is that the Fed will start cutting rates and then continue to do so through the
year 2026. That is the direction. One of the old adages that all of us were educated
decades ago was that you do not fight the Fed...ever. If the Fed is telling us that rates will
be cut, then we need to be ready for when that happens. How do we do that?
Bond yields and prices have a counter relationship with interest rates. In other words, as
rates rise, bond prices drop. As rates fall then bond prices rise. In simplest terms when
rates are falling you want to own bonds at longer maturities. I remember way back in 1994-
1995 when rates were rising quickly and steeply. At that point in time, it was possible to
buy an AAA rated insured tax-free municipal bond that had a rate of 7%. You read that right.
I spent all day talking to people about bonds and many conversations went like this:
Brad “Yes this a AAA rated muni with 7% for 25 years'”
Person “25 years? That is a long time. Why would I want to hold a bond for 25 years?”
Brad “Because it is paying you 7% tax free. If it were 100 years, I would be buying.”
Person “That’s just too long.”
You think they regretted that? You bet they did. The long-term return of the stock market is
only a few points higher than that (the S&P 500 annualized since 1957 is 10.5%) and that
7% rate was insured and tax free. At the 25% tax rate, this bond had a taxable equivalent
yield is a whopping 9.33%. Who wouldn’t want that kind of return that is all but
guaranteed? But the story gets better. As rates started their long walk downward, the
prices of these bonds went up every year as well. So not only did the investors receive that
7% tax free yield, but they also saw their principle rise annually as well.
The Fed is telling us that rates will go lower at some point, and it could take place for at
least a couple of years. Wouldn’t it make sense to start buying longer-term bonds knowing
this information? We are not suggesting 100-year maturities, however, if the ten-year
Treasury hits 5% we would have to look very intensely at buying all we can for investors.
That 5% sure would look nice in anyone’s portfolio if you ask me. I recently saw a chart that
was published by Charlie Bilello. He pointed out that the single best predictor of future
returns for bonds is the starting yield (in this case it was 97% correlation). With the recent
rise in rates, we have not seen prospective returns for bonds this high since 2007.
Our discussion on the equity markets
An Uncrowded Thought on Growth AND Value Rather than join the crowded debates on
more growth or value for the next market cycle, let us share with you a specific problem
that may lead to extraordinary profits, yet is an opportunity that’s priced cheaply. Lots of
investors’ attention and anxiety is being spent on the runaway success and risk of big
technology right now. There is a different lens we want to share with you, to look at the
same topic but from an uncrowded location in the markets.
Nvidia is one of the most astoundingly innovative companies we have witnessed in our
careers (and in history). We were fortunate to acquire a stake in the business several years
ago, after a deep dive we took to learn how Graphics Processing Units could change most
of what we knew about technology. We were simply curious, just as we are about this next
opportunity.
Now what may be the most surprising thing about powering the future of technology, will
be finding...the power. The next time you hear somebody reference the game-changing
potential of “AI” - smile and nod with the uncrowded knowledge of what remains the most
valuable game UNchanger – the electricity that all this technology needs.
You could buy every share of every single energy stock combined, for less than the market
cap of Nvidia. The operating income of the energy companies you’d be acquiring is 7x
greater than Nvidia’s – and it would cost you less. You don’t have to disagree with the
future of technology to see better values. In this remarkable case, the value is being
multiplied BY that future. To share one specific example, after data center construction in
Georgia, the utility delivering that state’s power revised its demand forecast by 2030 higher
- by 17x!
We will hazard a guess that a few blackouts over the summer will remind Americans, no
matter what their politics are, that each energy transition throughout history is actually a
net addition of all sources. Natural Gas is the most reliable and affordable source. The
companies producing, delivering and storing it have never had better balance sheets to
take advantage of increased demand. But getting power to data centers and elsewhere
also requires a lot of beautifully boring businesses that offer tremendous value for
investors. Traditional and renewable sources of power generation take a lot of good ole
fashioned wires and cables (a game UNchanger).
A project manager of one of those companies – Encore Wire - with its entire manufacturing
operations located in Texas (photo above), reminded us recently of a good ole fashioned
business metric that is wonderfully uncrowded, when he said, “We still cut multi-million
dollar deals with a handshake.” Those trusting us to find these opportunities to invest in
were rewarded with a buyout offer for their shares last month. The direction of the overall
markets do not matter to the limited supply of undervalued businesses with increasing
demand from their customers.
Interesting thoughts we discussed
According to the state lottery commissions and the Census Bureau, the Economist
reported that Americans in the poorest 1% of zip codes spend nearly $600 a year on lottery
tickets. What amount do you think the richest 1% spend on lottery tickets? $150 a year. As
a percentage of income, the poorest households spend 30x more than the richest
households. At first this fact really wowed me. But then I guess it started to make a little
more sense. Maybe, for many of the poor, this is their only hope of ever making their way
out of their financial situation.
Ryan sent me an email the other day. It was a You Tube video of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
speaking at the Stanford Insitute for Economic Policy Research. The audience was varied
including a fair number of some of Stanford's top business students. The interviewer asked
him what he would leave with these students. His answer was at first a bit shocking and
was met with nervous laughter.
“If I could wish anything upon you, I would wish upon you ample doses of pain and
suffering.”
He went on to explain that only through tough times do companies and people grow in
character. There is no growth when all is well. So, when he hears news about his company
that shows that there is pain ahead, he can greet it with cheer. This pain is nothing but an
opportunity to grow as a company.
Allocation suggestions
Taking in all the above and we continue to maintain that our portfolios have a base
allocation that is comprised of:
50% Stocks
30% Fixed Income
10-20% Private Investments or Alternatives
All investors and their plans are created differently, and every investor should have an
allocation that fits their needs. The above allocation is what we call our “base” which
primarily is for people looking to grow their assets. The percentages will change depending
on where clients are in their lifecycle and plans.
Redfish Capital Management, LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the State of Texas and only transacts business in
states where it is properly registered or is excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration as an investme nt
adviser does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the SEC, nor does it indicate that the adviser has attained a particular
level of skill or ability.
The content presented is developed from sources believed to be accurate and should not be regarded as a complete analysis of
the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the author and are subject to change. The information
in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. A legal or tax professional should be consulted for specific inform ation
regarding your individual situation.
The material presented is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the rendering of personalized
investment advice. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. All investment strategies have the potential for
profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific
investment or strategy will be suitable or profitable for a client's portfolio. Content should not be construed as an offer to buy or
sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned.
Comments